Sunday, January 16, 2011

The World According To Garp : John Irving

Image Credit: Tia's Book Musings
Every so often, I pick up a book that is generally considered a cult classic. Wow, I think, surely this book rocks! And every so often, I fail. To perceive the book's rockingness. The World According To Garp by John Irving needs no introduction. I am not even sure it needs a review. Yet, I sit here, rather lost on a hot Sunday morning and Garp, Helen, Jenny, Duncan, Roberta all floating around in the mind's home, and I think to myself, have I missed something?

After reading The World According To Garp, that's precisely the feeling I am left with. A sense of loss. A loss of understanding perhaps? A loss of memories? A sense of the loss of time? How often I have wished to belong to that cult readers sect, and exclaim with wonderful abandon while daintily sipping cocktails : Oh! I know! Isn't Garp amaaaazing? His terminal view of the world is suuuuuuch a reflection on the world we live in. And then again, I know that I would never make it to that cocktail set, sure to be daintily kicked out held guilty for sarcastic abandon. But back to Garp. Who is Garp? Novelist, father, husband, lover and son. Who is Jenny Garp? Nurse. Mother. So-called feminist. Writer. Who is Helen? Professor. Wife. Lover. Mother. Daughter. Who is Roberta? Man. Football player. Woman. Friend. Even as I write these labels, I wonder at the human species' remarkable ability to stick labels. We are walking human malls, urging everyone to take a look at our price tag. "Hey, I - the lover - am on sale today! Going fast!" Or how about this? "Fresh young mother. Tender and nurturing. Limited stocks available." Jenny Garp, a woman who decides that she wants to be a mother without the unnecessary tag-along of husband, says early on:

"In this dirty minded world, you are either someone's wife or someone's whore. And if you're not either people think there is something wrong with you....but there is nothing wrong with me"

Irving's themes of sexuality, adultery, love, violence, death and writing are well known though I haven't read any of his other novels. In the afterword to Garp, Irving writes that while the book is also about writing - the novelist's difficulty in consuming imagination over memory, it is also a book about fears. A father's fears. The Under Toad - a vague ominous note of anxiety runs throughout Garp. And really, Garp himself although he is described later as a 'man of energy' is a man gripped by anxiety. Indeed, isn't this the Age of Anxiety? Humans devoured with fear, afraid to act, (Garp for all this faults is not a man of inaction), afraid to love, afraid to befriend, afraid to seek a limitless vision. Does Garp have a vision? I am not sure. He is moody, irascible - he is vulnerable and achingly possessive and anxious about those he loves. Those he likes are very few though. Ding dong, a bell is ringing in my head! Who does this sound like? Someone who blogs under the name of Soul Muser. Hmm...;-)

Some of the scenes in Garp are supposed to be bizarre. I wouldn't qualify ANY of them as bizarre. No. Not even the car accident. Humans behave in such ways that to call it bizarre would just a gentle burnishing of the truth. And the truth is we are bizarre. There were some wonderful lines in the book, one of which I think reflects perfectly well on the kind of friendships people feel obliged to maintain:

...and they all settled into being the kind of friends many old friends become : that is, they were friends when they heard from each other - or when occasionally, they got together. And when they were not in touch, they did not think of each other. 

And I think Garp's curse here is so often my own:

It was Garp's curse to be unable to conceal his feelings from people, even from strangers; if he thought contemptuous thoughts about you, somehow you knew.

And I think no book lover would disagree with this gem from Garp:

To Garp, [TV's] glow looks like cancer, insidious and numbing, putting the world to sleep. Maybe television causes cancer, Garp thinks; but his real irritation is a writer’s irritation: he knows that wherever the TV glows, there sits someone who isn’t reading.

This is the last one from me, I promise!

They were involved in that awkward procedure of getting to unknow each other.

As you can see underneath the tragi-comic tone, there is a great deal of wisdom in Garp. I did not LOVE any of the characters, but I enjoyed reading about them in a clinical, detached way that perhaps Garp himself would have approved of. For really, we are all 'terminal cases.'

Verdict: A cult classic that deserves to be read. Whether it deserves to be loved is another matter. 


Rating: 3.5/5

8 comments:

  1. I hereby rename this book The World According to Soul. I need not comment any more on that

    ReplyDelete
  2. I sometimes get that feeling with classics - like I should be loving them but just don't. It's a shame this book was a bit of a let down for you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wonderful review, Soul! Sorry to know that you didn't like the book too much. This is a book that I have wanted to read sometime, but after reading your review, I am not so sure. I can understand your comment that sometimes when we read cult books, we don't know what the fuss was about. I remember reading Scott Fitzgerald's 'The Great Gatsby' and I couldn't understand what the fuss was about. On another occasion I recommended the movie 'Sholay' to one of my friends (I am a big fan of the movie) and he watched it and he couldn't understand what was great about it.

    I liked very much your comment - "Indeed, isn't this the Age of Anxiety? Humans devoured with fear, afraid to act, afraid to love, afraid to befriend, afraid to seek a limitless vision" - beautifully put! I also liked very much this line that you have quoted from the book - "he knows that wherever the TV glows, there sits someone who isn’t reading" - very true!

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's been a long time since I read Garp or any John Irving for that matter, but do remember the famous or infamous car accident it was known for. Perhaps John Irving was a writer for his era, sort of like Jonathan Franzen is today who might not be famous fifty years from now. I do remember much liking the book Garp at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "We are all terminal cases" ahhh.. indeed. You write very engaging reviews Soul. and if it's not superb according to Soul, it ain't worth spending time on it. :D

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great review. This isn't a classic I ever had a desire to read, but I have had some curiosity about what others felt about it. Thanks for taking the time to share the review, even though you weren't sure if it even needed to be reviewed. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Birdy - Shut up!!
    @Sam - Have you read the book? I agree with what you say - the guilt feeling that you MUST love is harder than not liking it!
    @Vishy - Hehe, I never did 'get' Sholay, so I am in the same league as your friend!
    @Tony - Interesting the part that memory plays in our book reading. I sometimes wonder if I would feel differently about a book I liked, if I went and read it during another phase/age in my life.
    @JoV - Thanks. Your comments are full of praise! I don't think I can quite live up to them :-)
    @Jessica - How come you were so decided that you wouldn't want to read it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. That was a wonderful review and I really loved the last quote :) Your verdict about this book is how I feel about Updike's Rabbit series. I am interested in the book, if only to see if I agree with it!

    ReplyDelete